THE TOTE IS BETTING AGAINST YOU—AND WINNING
After the great podcast by AK Bets highlighting underhand activity from the Tote
Ed Grimshaw
6/24/20253 min read


The Tote: Bookmaker or Book Thief?
Once a Churchillian gift to racing, now a suspicious uncle at the family BBQ
The Tote, that grand old relic of racing’s socialist dream, was meant to be a communal betting trough for the benefit of the sport. Profits for the people, back into racecourses, and not into the back pocket of some sunburnt Ladbrokes exec with a God complex. But that’s all gone the way of civility in pub quizzes.
Because now, thanks to a great podcast by AK Bets—a rare voice of clarity in a fog of compliance lingo and bland press releases—we’ve learned the Tote isn’t just hosting the party; it’s eating all the sausage rolls, swigging the prosecco, and charging guests for the pleasure.
Seeding: The Gentle Art of Betting Against Your Own Customers
If a normal bookie did this, they’d be chased out of town by lads with flat caps and pitchforks
Here’s how “seeding” works: the Tote, faced with sad, empty pools and payouts that would make a Monopoly banker weep, decides to help out—by betting in its own pools. With its own money. Against its own customers. Using publicly available info, it insists, though one suspects they’ve got more models running than Milan Fashion Week.
This, we’re told, is to “stimulate liquidity.” Right. And I drink wine to support the French economy.
In some races, the Tote’s bets make up half the pool. That’s not participation—it’s domination. It’s like entering your dog into a village vegetable competition and bringing a genetically enhanced marrow the size of a Ford Mondeo.
Transparency: About as clear as a pint of Guinness in a coal mine
Terms and conditions updated in silence—because nothing says “trust us” like changing the rules while no one’s looking
The Tote didn’t announce this strategy in a cheerful newsletter or a blunt blog post. No, it snuck in changes to its terms and conditions like a teenager hiding empty cider cans in the recycling. One day, you were betting against fellow punters; the next, you were unknowingly entering the Hunger Games with the organisers joining in.
If this was the financial sector, there’d be a scandal, a Select Committee, and a six-part Netflix documentary called The Pool Hustle. But this is British horse racing, where tradition often trumps scrutiny.
Is it Legal? Probably. Is it Ethical? Absolutely Not.
The Gambling Commission is quieter than a vegan at a hog roast
Technically, it’s allowed. Ethically, it’s murkier than the Thames at low tide. The Tote is now both referee and player, taking a cut of the pot and scooping up more if its seeded bets win. And since there’s no independent audit trail or oversight to confirm how much they’re raking in, punters are left to guess just how shafted they’ve been.
It’s as if Tesco ran a tombola, bought half the tickets, won the hamper, and then raised prices the next day “to reflect demand.”
Racing’s Robin Hood or its Goldman Sachs?
The Tote was created to support racing, not to become a bookmaker with a side hustle in mugging the mugs. Yet now, it seems content to siphon off profits in both directions—via the takeout, and via the wins. And if those winnings aren’t being returned to racing in full, we’re not just looking at a business model; we’re looking at a betrayal.
After all, Winston Churchill didn’t found the Tote so it could morph into a spreadsheet-addicted sidekick for venture capitalists. He founded it to give punters a square deal. What we’ve got now is a circle of confusion with the house always ahead.
The Final Furlong: Trust the Tote? Only if you trust pigeons not to s*** on your convertible
After the AK Bets exposé, this should be a turning point. A nail in the coffin of corporate bookmakers playing both priest and executioner. But it won’t be—because punters, bless them, still roll up with the loyalty of mistreated spaniels, convinced that this time the ball really will be thrown.
Until punters demand better—demand transparency, regulation, fairness—this sort of practice will carry on. Quietly. Profitably. And always at your expense.
In the end, the Tote doesn’t need to rob you. It just needs you to keep betting like it isn’t.