Woke Britain: Schools as Soft Play Centres?

Explore the debate on 'woke Britain' and its impact on schools, child development, and the growing call for schools to prioritize play over traditional learning methods.

POLITICSGENERAL

Ed Grimshaw

11/2/20254 min read

A NATION OF WET PANTS AND WHINGING

The Guardian—God bless it—has once again managed to turn the simple act of sending your child to school into a national crisis of identity. This week, courtesy of Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett (a woman who appears to believe that structure is a form of child abuse), we are told, with trembling sincerity, that sitting a five-year-old at a desk is tantamount to psychological warfare.

Apparently, children—those delicate little snowflakes covered in yoghurt and entitlement—aren’t ready to learn. No. What they need, according to this latest outburst of quinoa-fuelled pedagogy, is more play. More sandpits. More banging drums in cupboards. More pretending to be astronauts using spatulas and wooden blocks.

And less of this awful, oppressive business with… oh, I don’t know… reading, writing, or not defecating in a sand tray.

“PLAY IS LEARNING,” SAY THE PEOPLE WHO CAN’T GET THEIR KIDS TO SLEEP PAST 4AM

The central thesis of this article is that play isn’t just important—it is sacred. You see, in the modern parenting cult, play is no longer a fun way for toddlers to whack each other with plastic spatulas. It’s now been elevated to the status of “pedagogical core”—a phrase so pretentious it could wear a scarf indoors and write a blog about it.

And yes, there’s something deeply tragic about removing all creativity from a child’s day and replacing it with worksheets about phonemes. But there’s also something equally tragic about raising a generation of children who can name all seven emotions from Inside Out but need three adults to supervise a wee.

We are fast approaching the point where a child will graduate from reception able to identify their “social-emotional triggers,” but not their own bloody shoes.

WHEN DID TEACHING BECOME BABYSITTING WITH FEELINGS?

According to Cosslett, the jump from nursery to Year 1 is “too stark.” You walk into the reception class—glitter, laughter, someone chewing a rubber dinosaur—and then straight into Year 1, where children are... gasp... at desks, being taught by a teacher.

It’s like she’s describing a war crime.

Let me just say something outrageous: desks are not the enemy. Sitting still for 10 minutes without needing to re-enact The Lion King with finger puppets is not some dystopian overreach of state control. It’s called growing up.

But in Guardianland, any form of structure is seen as an oppressive regime. These are the same people who think detentions are “trauma-inducing” and that spelling tests should be replaced with “spontaneous word exploration through movement.”

THE SCANDINAVIAN MYTH – WHERE EVERY CHILD IS A HAPPY ELF

Inevitably, we are reminded that in Scandinavia, children don’t start school until seven. They spend their early years climbing trees, skinning moose, or whatever hygge-infused nonsense passes for education up there. They are apparently all emotionally balanced, well-socialised, multilingual saints who can whittle a reindeer sled before they’ve even read a textbook.

And yes, good for them. But we are not in Denmark. We are in Dudley. Where the budget for classroom furniture is roughly £3.80, and the only Nordic influence in the curriculum is a battered IKEA pencil sharpener in the staffroom.

GOVE DID IT! (AGAIN)

Of course, no Guardian op-ed is complete without blaming Michael Gove. To be fair, the man has a track record of approaching education reform like a pub quiz master with a Red Bull problem. But to suggest that we’ve created a nation of broken children because Year 1 now includes phonics is a bit rich.

Yes, standards were raised. Yes, children are being taught more, earlier. But you can’t complain that kids can’t read by age six and that expecting them to sit still for ten minutes is cruel.

Choose one, Rhiannon.

What these nostalgic parents never mention is that play-based learning, in reality, often involves a lot of snot, tears, and small children shouting “poo” at each other for 45 minutes. Teachers aren’t strolling through whimsical woodland scenes. They’re separating fights over glitter pots and explaining, again, that you can’t eat the Pritt Stick.

Oh, and then there's the part no one wants to say aloud: many five-year-olds still aren’t toilet trained.

Yes. In this age of “child-led everything,” it's now controversial to suggest that a five-year-old should be able to find their own backside with a wet wipe. But in the rush to honour everyone’s “developmental timeline,” we’ve somehow turned basic hygiene into a lifestyle choice.

So while Rhiannon dreams of schools full of happy chaos and magical dens, teachers are scraping poo out of Lego.

THE CULT OF THE SANCTIMOMMY

It’s not just the kids who are out of control. The parents are worse. These are the same lot who write letters to headteachers demanding that their child be excused from the “repressive phonics test” and offered instead “a woodland immersion project celebrating linguistic fluidity.”

These are people who bring their four-year-old to open days and ask whether the school library includes gender non-conforming narratives and whether the teacher has received trauma-informed water play training.

Meanwhile, the child is licking the radiator.

SO WHAT SHOULD WE ACTUALLY DO?

Here’s the boring but necessary truth: children need both. They need time to play, yes—but they also need to learn to sit still, hold a pencil, and engage with ideas that aren’t being delivered via a ukulele.

Learning is hard. That’s the point. It’s what prepares them for a world that, shockingly, does not always involve face paint and a sand tray.

And no, a five-year-old isn’t a miniature office worker. But nor are they a Zen master whose inner self will blossom through abstract block play. Sometimes they just need to learn the difference between “cat” and “mat” without being asked how that makes them feel.

FINAL THOUGHT

So yes, Cosslett wants a school that’s “alive with laughter and play.” Don’t we all. But unless that school also teaches basic literacy and can get your kid to go to the loo without a ten-step sensory debrief, then what you’ve got isn’t a school. It’s a very expensive creche with fairy lights.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I need to go teach my five-year-old how to tie his shoelaces without first asking what trauma he inherited from the Industrial Revolution.

Because that, Rhiannon, is learning.