Jane Dodds: The Bargain-Basement Politician Who Sold Out an Entire Sport for a Budget Deal

It’s the political equivalent of setting a house on fire and then demanding praise for calling the fire brigade.

SPORT

Ed Grimshaw

2/20/20254 min read

In the great, seedy marketplace of modern politics, where principles are bought and sold like cheap tat at a car boot sale, Jane Dodds has proved herself a true master of the trade. With a single vote, the Liberal Democrat leader and part-time greyhound enthusiast has managed to extinguish an entire sport—not through debate, not through evidence, but through a grubby political bargain that stinks worse than a bookmaker’s ashtray at closing time.

For a government teetering on the edge of losing £4bn in funding, Dodds’ price was laughably small. A few extra quid for councils and childcare, some protection for a minor railway line, and, crucially, a greyhound racing ban she could parade around like a moral victory.

Thus, a century-old sport, thousands of jobs, and an entire way of life were tossed aside—not in the name of ethics, but in the name of political expediency.

Dodds: "Passionate" About Greyhounds—Just Not Their Future

Dodds, we are told, is a "passionate rescue greyhound owner". She loves these dogs, you see. She cares for them. And so, in an act of stunning moral clarity, she has decided that their entire existence in racing should be abolished.

The dogs will now be "saved" from a sport they were bred, trained, and enthusiastically willing to participate in—only to face a future of abandonment, overburdened rescue centres, and an uncertain fate.

This is, of course, the classic modern political move:

  1. Ban a thing to make yourself look virtuous.

  2. Ignore the actual consequences of the ban.

  3. Wait for another crisis to emerge as a direct result of your actions.

  4. Declare yourself the saviour of the new crisis you created.

Make no mistake—there will be a flood of "heartbreaking" stories about homeless greyhounds in a year or two. And when that happens, Jane Dodds will be first in line to campaign for even more government funding for greyhound rehoming centres, oblivious to the fact that she is the reason they need more funding in the first place.

It’s the political equivalent of setting a house on fire and then demanding praise for calling the fire brigade.

The Welsh Government: Governing by Bribes and Bans

Let’s not forget the real villains here: the Welsh Government, who should have had the backbone to say no to this absurd political ransom. But, given the choice between defending a lawful, regulated sport or getting their budget across the line, they folded faster than a drunk gambler on a losing streak.

  • Did they hold a proper debate? No.

  • Did they allow time for real scrutiny of the evidence? No.

  • Did they cave to a single, desperate politician in exchange for a budget deal? Absolutely.

And the best part? The ban isn’t even properly planned yet.

The Minister responsible—Huw Irranca-Davies, who now has the honour of being the first politician in history to link climate change and rural affairs to a greyhound track in the Valleys—admits that there isn’t even a law in place yet. The government still needs to work out how to actually implement the ban, which will require either a full bill or a new set of regulations, neither of which has been drafted.

This is what governance looks like in Wales: decisions first, logic later.

The "Extreme Animal Rights" Movement Gets Its Way

Unsurprisingly, the Greyhound Board of Great Britain is less than impressed, describing this decision for what it really is:

“The Welsh administration has today admitted that this has nothing to do with greyhound racing but is a dirty, dodgy backroom deal to get their budget through.”

They also point out that this is yet another victory for the extreme animal rights movement, who have no interest in reforming or improving sports like greyhound racing, only banning them outright.

They are not satisfied with better welfare standards, stronger regulations, or improved rehoming. They only want abolition, no matter what the consequences are. And once they’ve succeeded with greyhounds, they will move onto horseracing, show-jumping, eventing, and anything else that involves an animal doing something other than standing in a field.

If greyhound racing is gone today, what’s stopping them from coming for the Grand National tomorrow?

What Next? Wales, the Land Where Everything Is Banned

This is not just a ban on greyhound racing—this is a blueprint for how Wales is governed now.

  • Can't balance a budget? Find a politician desperate enough to trade their vote for a moral crusade.

  • Can’t solve a problem? Ban the thing that makes it visible.

  • Can’t answer difficult questions? Just pretend it’s about "ethics" and move on.

This is why Wales now has:

  • A 20mph speed limit on most roads, because the government doesn’t trust you to drive sensibly.

  • Minimum alcohol pricing, because they don’t trust you to drink responsibly.

  • A ban on new roads, because they don’t trust you to drive at all.

  • And now, a ban on greyhound racing, because they don’t trust you to enjoy anything.

It’s a nation governed by restriction, prohibition, and control—not by competence or logic, but by the fear that someone, somewhere, might be taking a risk and enjoying themselves.

Jane Dodds: A One-Woman Wrecking Ball

And so, a single Liberal Democrat MS with no real power, no real influence, and no real connection to the sport has dictated the fate of greyhound racing in Wales.

All because she was willing to sell out an entire industry in exchange for some political scraps from the Labour table.

Jane Dodds is not a hero. She is not a champion of democracy. She is a political opportunist who has used her one tiny shred of influence to force through an ideological ban that was never about evidence, but about personal agenda.

And when the dust settles, when the greyhound industry in Wales is gone, and when the consequences of this decision finally come to light, Dodds will not take responsibility.

No, she will move on to her next crusade, her next campaign, her next moral cause.

Because greyhounds were never the point. Politics was.

And that is the real tragedy of this entire farce.